Monday, August 27, 2007
Some updates (updated 9/1/07)
NY Times article of 9/13/07 concerning brief filed with Judge Hudson pleading him to sentence Vick to 57 months in prison.
See IDA's "Give Vick's Dogs a Fighting Chance" report of 9/05/07 for something you can do now to help the dogs live.
New York Times article from 8/31/07 "Menacing Dogs from Vick Case Await Their Fate"
New York Times article from 8/29/07 "Dogs From Vick’s Kennel Have to Pass a Behavior Test" reporting that ASPCA will test each dog but expects only 10-20 percent to pass.
Elizabeth Merrill's report for ESPN about efforts underway to spare the Vick's dogs lives
Best Friends Animal Sanctuary in Utah (which has volunteered to take some of the dogs). Apparently, the federal government has asked the ASPCA in NY to evaluate the dogs.
Atlanta Journal Constitution
Santa Cruz Sentinel
See also PETA's blog for why they believe the animals taken from the Vick property must be euthanized.
PLEASE NOTE: This site was not set up to discuss the Michael Vick case or dogfighting in general. It was set up solely for the purposes of bringing awareness to the 53 individual dogs who were the victims who helped bring the Vick case to light. Please see other sites if you wish to weigh in on the Michale Vick case itself. For instance, please visit, among many others www.TitanicBugle.blogspot.com
Saturday, August 25, 2007
Please circulate this blog to others. Time is running out for the Vick dogs.
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Please Help Save Vick's Dogs
Please do what you can do to stop the government from killing those poor pit bulls. Surely someone can come up with a solution. Here are several suggestions of things you can do NOW to save the dogs from being killed after Vick pleads guilty on Monday, August 27th (see following posts for details).
(1) Write to Last Chance for Animals and plead with them to help find a solution.
(2) Write to Judge Henry E. Hudson and plead with him not to authorize killing the dogs until after a sufficient time has passed for responsible parties to an alternative to killing them.
(3) Write to the other animal welfare/protection organizations and plead with them to stop saying that the dogs must be killed because they are too dangerous and to help find a solution.
(4) Write to the state prosecutor (who has yet to files charges against Vick and his companions) regarding Vick's dogs.
(5) Other suggestions. If anyone has any other suggestions, please post a comment here.
If anyone sees something in this Blog that is not correct, please let us know in a comment.
Thank you for your help and for recognizing that all life is valuable.
By the way, if anyone needs to be convinced that dogs deemed dangerous can go on to lead peaceful lives, please read Vicki Hearne's "Bandit: The Dossier of a Dangerous Dog."
(1) Send e-mail or fax to Last Chance for Animals
Here is the contact information of LCA.
Chris De Rose
Last Chance For Animals
8033 Sunset Blvd. #835
Los Angeles, CA 90046
PH: 310-271-6096
FX: 310-271-1890
www.LCAnimal.org
Here is LCA's agent's press release on LCA's role in the Vick case and web site where you can leave a message.
Eileen Koch
Eileen Koch & Company
1830 Pelham Avenue, Ste 302
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Phone: 310-441-1000
Fax: 310-441-3030
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=762856
Here is a letter we just sent to both places.
Chris DeRose
Last Chance for Animals
I saw the press release for clarifying LCA's and Chris DeRose's role in the Vick case. Thank you for clarifying that as there was so much hype by other animal welfare/protection organizations, it was quite unclear who was doing what.
While I agree that it is important that we ask Judge Hudson to throw the book at Vick to send a clear message to others and to make sure he understands the gravity of what he did, I think all of the animal welfare organizations are missing the most important thing right now, which is to spare Vick's dogs. Everyone seems to feel that there is no alternative but to euthanize them when they are no longer need as evidence. To my way of thinking, that is so contrary to what the animal welfare/protection movement is all about. If someone cannot come up with a solution for keeping those dogs, we have all failed at what we are trying to accomplish. Think about what saving those dogs would do. Sure, they will not live the life of a free dog, but they will live. Please do what you can do to give these dogs one last chance at life. If LCA leads an effort to spare those dogs and succeeds, I will divert a major portion of my annual contributions for the next five years from my usual list to animal welfare organizations to LCA. Surely, you can find 250 or 500 others who would be willing to do the same.
I can think hundreds of tougher challenges in the animal welfare business today other than saving Vick's dogs. If someone cannot save them, why are we striving to do so much more. Think about the good this would do for all the other pit bulls send to their death each day because of their reputation. I would not be sending this message if I did not thinlk LCA could succeed at this. The truth is that I would have been more impressed if the press release addressed this challenge and not the one of advisor to the government during the investigation.
Please do not abandon Vick's dogs. They want to live. Please see what you can do to give them a chance to live for the first time.
(2) Send a Letter to Judge Henry E. Hudson
Judge Hudson's contact information is:
Honorable Henry E. Hudson
United States District Court
1000 E Main St
Suite 305
Richmond, VA 23219
Phone: (804) 916-2290
FAX: (804) 501-5505
Here is a letter that was sent to the Judge:
Honorable Henry E. Hudson
Judge, United States District Court
Easter Virginia (4th) District
1000 E Main St
Suite 305
Richmond, VA 23219
RE: Michael Vick's Dogs
Dear Judge Hudson:
My purpose in writing is not to plead with you to give Michael Vick his due once he pleads guilty, as I am sure many others have done. From all I have read about you, I am quite confident that whatever decision you make will be an appropriate one, given the facts as they have been reported in this horrific case. What I am writing about is something I do not even know is within your authority to do anything about, and that concerns the fate of Michael Vick's dogs, the victims of his alleged crimes.
As I understand it, once there is no longer a need to keep Vick's dogs as evidence, they will be destroyed because they are too dangerous to be kept around. What shocks me more than Vick's and his accomplices' alleged crimes is thet attitude that so many people (including the humane organizations I support) have that these poor dogs cannot be rehabilitated or, barring that, cannot live peaceful lives somewhere. The reason we have the laws on the books making cruelty to animals illegal is because we believe that their lives can be as meaningful to them as our lives are to us. If that is the case, why, then, will Vick get 18 months or so for brutally harming and killing 60 dogs or more, but these poor dogs get death for being his unwilling vicitms? That is at least unfair, if not plainly inconsistent ethically.
My purpose in writing is to do nothing more than ask you to not permit the destruction of Vick's dogs until every avenue has been explored to either rehabilitate these dogs or give them peaceful lives in their few remaining years. (I am sure Chris DeRose from Last Chance for Animals, who helped out during the investigation, can find a soltuion. I have already pledged my support to him if he does so.) Any life they will be able to have will be infinitely better than the lives they have had so far. They --- and not Vick and his accomplices --- should be the reminders of not only the animal cruelty that goes on in our country, but the fact that we can bring victims back from their hellish lives to the lives they deserve. So please, sir, show not only justice to Vick, but, more importantly, compassion to his victims. If it is within your authority to do so, please instruct the government to find a non-fatal solution for the dogs. Any justice to Vick will be empty and meaningless unless something is done for the victims while there is still time.
Thank you for reading this letter.
Sincerely,
(3) Send letters to HSUS, PETA, ASPCA, etc, to change their message and spare the dogs
Here is the contact information for these organizations:
The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS):
www.HSUS.org
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA):
www.aspca.org
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA):
www.peta.org
American Humane Association (AHA)
www.americanhumane.org/
(4) Write to the state prosecutor regarding Vick's dogs.
On a state level, Commonwealth Attorney Gerald Poindexter claims he will pursue additional charges in Surry County, Virginia, where killing a companion animal is punishable by 5 years in prison. Please take a moment to e-mail Mr. Poindexter and urge him to prosecute Vick and his companions for killing companion animals, animal cruelty, and the other senseless acts of violence. But more important, please urge Mr. Poindexter to focus on the victims and urge him to do all he can to make sure they are not destroyed but sent to refuges where they can live out their lives and enjoy peace for the first time in their lives.
Mr. Poindexter's email is: gpoindexter@courts.state.va.us
A sample letter will be posted here soon.
(5) Other things you might do
Thank you.
Why the Vick Dogs Should be Saved
Why the Vick Dogs Should be saved.
The whole sordid Michael Vick affair came to light as the result of a drug bust that was made on his property in Surry County, Virginia, in April of this year,. During the course of that drug bust, the authorities discovered Vick's dog fighting operation and seized the 53 living dogs --- all pit bulls --- from the property. The dogs were not seized and kept alive out of humane concerns but because they were needed as evidence. From what I have read, since that time, those poor dogs have been living in cramped conditions in an undisclosed location, many not even being given an opportunity to be walked. The authorities gave the owners of those dogs until the week ending August 25th to come forward to claim those dogs, as they are required to do by law. No one did. (Why anyone would come forward to claim the dogs is beyond me, because if they did, they would be immediately charged with crimes similar to Vick and his accomplices. Perhaps the government was hoping that the real owners would be stupid enough to come forward thinking they would be given immunity from prosecution simply because they had the heart to claim the dogs.)
In recent weeks, the focus of the government authorities and the humane associations has been on getting Vick convicted for the heinous acts that he and others committed at that hellish place of his. Not once, though, did I read anywhere that anyone showed any concern for the seized animals. In fact it was just the opposite. From all that I read, government authorities (in this case, the federal government) and the animal welfare organizations (e.g., The Humane Society of the Untied States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, American Humane Association, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and others) were saying that, sadly, all the dogs might have to be euthanized because they were too dangerous to keep around, even though they have admitted that the dogs are not dangerous to their human handlers, only perhaps to other dogs. Not once did I read of any of any animal welfare organizations that was willing to step forward and say they the dogs should be given some chance to live.
Well, expressing only "sadness" about the inevitable fate of these dogs is not good enough for me. Although I admit that I am not an expert of the recovery and rehabilitation of dogs seized from dog fighting rings, I got tired of hearing that these dogs would have to put to death when they are no longer needed as evidence, and that's why I started this blog after being encouraged to do so by at least one compassionate soul who felt the way that I did.
After I started the blog, I read that as part of the plea agreement, Vick has agreed to pay for the long-term care or the humane euthanasia of the dogs. That told me that at least in the back of someone's mind in the government there is the chance that some or all of the dogs can be saved.
Without having had the time to put my thoughts into some philosophical essay form, here are the 14 reasons I believe the dogs ought to be spared, and I do not mean just some of them, I mean all of them.
1- A solution that favors LIFE is always preferable to one that favors DEATH, unless suffering would be involved,
2- These dogs were lucky enough to be seized, now they should be lucky enough to be allowed to live.
3- These dogs can be used as reminders to us for at least several years of the cruelty that dog fighting doles out to the animals, Let them be as ambassadors for this purpose so that we do not forget.
4- The reason these dogs are alive is that they fought hard in order to live. Now is our chance to show them that they earned what they fought so hard for.
5- Vick is going to be the one to pay for their costs. If he does not spend it on these dogs, when he gets out fo prison, he will spend the money on comfort items for himself. This would be wrong to let him do that. He must have a living reminder of his wrongdoing.
6- The reason Vick is being convicted is because "we" have said it is wrong to inflict harm on animals. If we kill Vick's dogs and say there is nothing we can do about them , we are almost as bad as he is. How can we create laws because of our concern for dogs, but then after we punish the people who inflicted injury or death on those dogs, turn around and kill who were the victims supposedly protected under those laws. It does not make sense.
7- Sure these dogs will never live normal lives of dogs. For instance, they will probably never be able to be around another dogs. But any life they will lead will be infinitely better than the lives they would have led under Vick. Whatever life they have without suffering will be a life that has meaning to them. (And surely some ingenious person should be able to develop some kind of a muzzle that will allow these dogs to be around each other without inflicting harm. If ever there was the opportunity to invent something like this, this is it. And all at Vick's expense. Think how many other dogs will benefit in the long run.)
8- The dogs can used as models to show that dogs seized from fighting rings can be rehabilitated or lead otherwise pleasant lives.
9- If we cannot find a solution for this problem, how can we say that we can find solutions for the many other problems facing the animals, the planet or humans? How will we ever be able to find a solution for the problem of dogs being used for fighting, whether they be pit bulls or others? Surely that problem is harder than finding a home for Vick's dogs now.
10- Sure there are many other animals (not to mention people) that need our time, attention and money. But these dogs need it too.
11- Even if these dogs are declared dangerous dogs, the law provides means by which dangerous dogs can be kept. We should follow those laws ourselves.
12- If the dogs are kept, Michael Vick ought to be given the chance to tour the country with them showing that he is changed man, able to show compassion to his dogs (although this Blogger does not believe he is able to do that).
13- If the Vick dogs are killed, it is going to feed the paranoia and myth about the viciousness of pit bulls, and it will lead to thousands of more deaths of these poor dogs and then, when there are no more pit bulls around to kill, whatever breed succeeds them.
14- It is the right thing to do
To be continued. If anyone has any other ideas, please add them in a comment below.
An afterthought. While no one has suggested the following question yet, I have heard it so often before in other contexts that I will raise it here myself, and that is this: Why should we spend so much time, effort and money on trying to save these 53 pit bulls when there are so many pitbulls, dogs, animals, people or earth causes that could benefit from our resources? Of course, those readers who have already thought about that question know what the answer is. For the benefit of those who have not had the opportunity to raise it before, you would be absolutely right in asking it because there really are so many, many compassion opportunities at any one time that need all our attention. My guess is, though, that if you took the time to visit this blog you are one of those compassionate people who have been faced with this question many times already. There are, of course, many answers that I could give, and have given, but the one that keeps coming back to me time and time again is this. When I have learned of something going on in the world that I have concluded is wrong, and if I know there is something I can do about, I really have no choice but to act and do those things that are within my reach and means to do so. Time and time again I have proven myself correct in my assumption that one person can make a difference. But more importantly, time and time again when I have acted, regardless of the outcome of those actions and the similar actions of others, I have felt good about myself and the knowledge that I have reduced or tried to reduce suffering and opted for life. Beyond that, each opportunity I seize to do something like this strengthens me in my resolve and in my skills to do something even greater the next time. It will do the same for you. And more than just feeling good about yourself, you will actually reduce suffering. And that, in my estimation, is why we are all here.
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
WARNING - THE BELOW DISTURBING PHOTO DEPICTS A DOG SERIOUSLY INJURED IN A DOG FIGHT AND IS EXTREMELY GRAPHIC
The above Pit Bull dog (named Gypsy) , who was injured in a dog fighting situation, was not one of the dogs discovered at Michael Vick's property. This photograph was obtained from other web sources. While the photo is extremely difficult to look at, I decided to show it here because the truth must get out about dog fighting. This --- or worse, if you can believe that --- is the kind of damage that these poor dogs are made to inflict on each other. Dog fighting has got to be stopped. So when you think about what fate Michael Vick and others like him should face, think of Gypsy. She fought not because she wanted to, but because she was made to, and because she wanted to live. That's why all the Vick dogs should be allowed to live. And that's why cities and towns have got to stop killing pit bulls themselves. These dogs want to live as much as you and I do.